Larry Sinclair; certifiable nut in affidavit says he and Obama partied with cocaine and had sex in 1999
- By Ken Pittman
- Published 02/22/2008
Ken Pittman
Ken Pittman is the afternoon voice for Greater New Bedford's WBSM 1420.
From 2PM thru 6PM M-F..
Ken's Bio
If the NY Times can go ahead with a story about allegations of sex and illegal influence on presidential candidate (R)Sen. McCain, without any evidence or witness, then I suppose it is fine for media like me to go ahead with a scandalous story about drugs and gay sex that comes with an alleged participant and witness to the said events regarding (D)Sen. Obama
Unlike the NY Times article, the Obama accuser is willing to come forward and has taken the Illinois senator to court specifying events and stating that he is willing to take a polygraph test. Now, do I think the Sinclair guy is legit? Nope but what is good for McCain should be good for Obama.
Thesmokinggun.com
Article and Federal Affidavit of the bizarre claims of Mr. Sinclair who has filed a lawsuit in a Minnesota federal court.
Youtube.com
Video of Larry Sinclair accusing Sen. Obama of having gay sex in limo in 1999 and accuses him of smoking crack cocaine during the romp.
Since the liberals have taken the liberty of accusing Mrs. McCain of illicit drug use and Sen. McCain of infidelity, the shoe is now on the other foot by simply using their own standard of journalism.
Unlike the NY Times article, the Obama accuser is willing to come forward and has taken the Illinois senator to court specifying events and stating that he is willing to take a polygraph test. Now, do I think the Sinclair guy is legit? Nope but what is good for McCain should be good for Obama.
Thesmokinggun.com
Article and Federal Affidavit of the bizarre claims of Mr. Sinclair who has filed a lawsuit in a Minnesota federal court.
Youtube.com
Video of Larry Sinclair accusing Sen. Obama of having gay sex in limo in 1999 and accuses him of smoking crack cocaine during the romp.
Since the liberals have taken the liberty of accusing Mrs. McCain of illicit drug use and Sen. McCain of infidelity, the shoe is now on the other foot by simply using their own standard of journalism.
Spread The Word
Comments
Comment #1 (Posted by sands)
Gary (sic) Studds, Gary (sic) Studds,!!!! JIm Webbs novels!!! C'mon Pittman keep your integrity in check!!!!!!
Comment #2 (Posted by Sean Mac)
No kidding Sands. Have a clue. At the very least Ken has shown the reader a witness, alleged or not and he also discredited the guy. You really are sad.
Comment #3 (Posted by Dana)
Sands doesn't disappoint. Pittman used the same (if not better) standard of the NY Times and he has a problem with it. LOL what a joke you are.
Comment #4 (Posted by Kathy)
Thanks for the example of how these people react Ken. This Sands is clearly not interested in both sides being fair, just Republicans.
Comment #5 (Posted by Bob Grant)
A party to the allegation is willing to come forward and take a lie detector test... That is clearly a higher bar than the NYTimes set for their report on McCain...
Comment #6 (Posted by Puzzled)
It's funny that the whining jackasses on the right weren't so concerned about sourcing methods at the NY Times when Judith Miller was publishing Saddam/WMD fables courtesy of a single, anonymous source (Ahmed Chalabi.) * I can heckle and lie but I won't call Ken and speak directly as he asked me to. That would take courage.
Comment #7 (Posted by Puzzled The Yellow)
Ken so what if the GOP had a 574% growth in the 2008 primary. So what if gays and their indebted politicians (many who are closeted gays) manipulated the law to get a radical gay ruling in Massachusetts. Deal with the fact that my rubber panties almost fit me right.
Comment #8 (Posted by Puzzled)
Barack, Sinclair and me. What a country. ken you obviously fail when you only brought your ratings up from .5% to 5.9%. I could do a show about vigils and dance and really talk up a show. The Village needs people.
Comment #9 (Posted by the returning butt chomping Puzzled)
Ah yes, "ratings". Just because yours are way up and the areas GOP vote went up by more than 4,000 doesn't mean I have to like it.
Comment #10 (Posted by sands)
Your arguments are so solid it's no wonder you are so successful.
Comment #11 (Posted by Puzzled)
It's obvious that I can dish out insults but prove to be thin skinned when I get hit back harder than I can hit. I realize Ken isn't homophobic, he's just just sick of me lobbing shots from the land of Cowardania.