Moral absolutes are something atheists claim to be impossible in a universe which came to be out of nothing, due to random chance.
For those who believe that the universe comes from a design by an intelligence as in a God or creator with a purpose, morality comes with certainty and certainly with an incontestable authority.
I'm a moral absolutes kind of guy. I believe there are things that are right and things that are wrong.
I see conclusive wisdom in adhering to the Ten Commandments for example.

1) Thou shalt not have strange gods before me. 
2) Thou shalt not make to thyself a graven thing
3) Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain
4) Remember that thou keep holy the sabbath day.
5) Honour thy father and thy mother
6) Thou shalt not kill.
7) Thou shalt not commit adultery.
8) Thou shalt not steal.
9) Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
10)Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house: neither shalt thou desire his wife, nor his servant, nor his handmaid, nor his ox, nor his ass,
nor any thing that is his


Some of these commandments I adhere to based on an understanding of why they are sound. A few are hard to figure out the evils in but I adhere to these based on trust. I trust that God doesn't want me to do certain things for my own good and at the same time insists that I do other certain things that are good for me whether I comprehend the reasons or not. On a smaller scale, a parent might not explain in detail to their child why they don't want him or her to leap off of the curb but the child trusts that the command is likely for their own good. Later the child learns about people and animals who stepped off the curb and were injured or killed by motor vehicles zooming by just a few steps from the sidewalk.
Whether it be The Pope, Billy Graham, C.S. Lewis or some other Christian intellectual, there is a counter-thinking atheist who insists that there is no
true right and wrong. There is no black and white on matters of morality, only grey.

Along comes the ACLU. The American Civil Liberties Union, who's founder Roger Baldwin described his core beliefs as this: "I am for socialism,
disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state (United States Government) itself...I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class,
and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal."
So if communism is the goal, then belief in God becomes an obstacle in that goal. Karl Marx wrote, "Die Religion ... ist das Opium des Volkes."
Translated from German to English it means, "Religion is the opiate of the masses". Marx's famous utterance, which is a quite unoriginal borrowing
 of Marquis de Sade, is part of his philosophy of "social justice" which by requirement, assumes a hostility toward God and any organized belief system in him.
Communists strive to convince humanity that the "ruse" of religion or miracle should be regarded as a predatory controlling mechanism,
a stage of the past and that society can only make truly progressive strides once it is liberated from the bonds of a fairytale.

Today the fruits of the ACLU presense in American courts have been:
The Supreme Court ruling that the 1st Amendment means a separation of church and state.
The legality of the mother's right to slaughter her unborn children in the womb (abortion on demand).
Same-sex marriage (in Massachusetts and fought for in many states at the time of this article).
Gay adoption.
Advocation of the Gay lifestyle in public schools and many other regressive efforts to go against the grain of basic core values of most Americans.

The latest? The ACLU proudly presents: The right to sex in public bathroom stalls.

Idaho Senator Larry Craig take heart and so should you other perverts, because according to the ACLU it is an American's civil right to sodomize and co-masturbate in
public restroom stalls with other consenting adults if anyone so desires.
I kid you not folks, the ACLU is in court arguing that people having sex in public bathroom stalls should be able to do so, unfettered by authorities.

According to Yahoo News, The ACLU filed a brief Tuesday January 15th, 2008 supporting Craig.
It cited a Minnesota Supreme Court ruling 38 years ago that found that people who have sex in closed stalls in public restrooms "have a reasonable expectation of privacy".

I guess I must be a homophobic bigot if I don't agree.
Well, I don't agree. I think a mom or dad should be able to bring his or her child into a public restroom without having
to worry about overhearing and or seeing anything of the sort for one. Second this provides a scenario where a pedophile would be given the legal right to spy from the stall at a child using a urinal and then have the civil right to use the image to masturbate right there and then. Personally I would likely send someone's teeth through the back of their head if they
made sexual advances to me simply because I needed to use a urinal in a public restroom.
It's not gay bashing just because the guy I happen to bash is gay. Anyone looking to have sex over a dirty toilet is a sexual deviant. Sorry but there are moral absolutes and the right to use the freakin' Mens Room comes with certain inalienable expectations. No grey area here.