Since the early 1980s, the heterosexual community was proved as a whole, to not be bigoted and hateful of the gays in society when it heeded to the legitimate cries of the homosexual community leaders looking for the American government and its people to help combat AIDS. The nation, in fact the world poured billions of dollars into research to stop the lethal and cruel virus. Many radical gays since then however, have used the issue to wedge into many political arenas. Borrowing pages from the Civil Rights movement of the 1960s, the gay community has demanded, and has been granted, many advancements in society (many to which I applaud). What has transpired since westerners began "coming out" upon the revelation that mass lynchings did not result of it, has been an open assault on conservatives and the religious which frowned on homosexual activity.
A reverse discrimination has been taking place and it is a bigotry liberals are too fearful to deal with since they have become so dependent on the gay lobby as political allies.
Only ten years ago it was quite politically correct to be a Christian-minded Democrat. Today the culture shepherds on the left have made it increasingly difficult for Democrats and all progressives to espouse a devout religious lifestyle. This intolerance has particularly effected the Christians more so than Jewish or Muslims to the left of center. As society leans left, in part to a mobilized, smart and effective lobbying by the gay community, action taken against opponents strengthens and criticism is repressed.
When Massachusetts gave way to legal same-sex marriage in a 4-3 vote by the Supreme Court, any individual or group that resisted was met with a venomous hatred not allowed to the opposition. A good example of this environment is found on the South-coast of Massachusetts in the city of New Bedford.
Enter Phil Paleologos, a longtime city resident and owner of a popular landmark restaurant called "The Shawmut Diner". Phil has been met with a venom and hatred not found since "Wham" broke up. His outspoken position on the defense of marriage as being strictly between one man and one woman cost him more than just a few "friends". As a community volunteer and board member of a local health center, Phil noticed the blanketed "black balling" by the liberal community. Both elected and private citizens have turned on him and refuse to acknowledge that there was ever any warmth in the past.
He is a New Bedford Apostate. Once one is exposed as not agreeing with the far left it is a certain social suicide for which there is no returning. "Sure its disappointing because I know that for me, there is no hatred in my heart and its sad to see there is for those who I disagree with", Phil once told me after he took part in a rally organized by the Vote On Marriage group. The vile and classlessness of the hecklers and disrupter's of the peace revealed a clear double standard by the print press and social elite in New Bedford. The local newspaper, The New Bedford Standard Times, whose editorial board has a healthy fraction of homosexuals on it, has been a loud proponent of expanding marriage to at least gays so far, and refuses to let the readers know that the Op/Ed board members have several gays in the ranks. The failure to disclose this fact is just another blatant example of the unprofessionalism of the paper. The editor Bob Unger agreed with me that the editorial board should volunteer this information to the readers since the company is "not allowed to ask", he claims he doesn't and couldn't possibly know who is or isn't gay on the board. That is a good official answer but obviously not quite truthful. My analogy to convince him was this; If a member of the opinion & editorial board was lobbying daily in the newspaper for Pro-Life laws and the member was a Roman Catholic priest, then the paper would be obliged to inform the public of such. Being a gay and lobbying for gay marriage in the same scenario has the double standard which is exactly what I am writing about here.
I think today, it is the position of the far left to pressure its members to eventually denounce Christianity as being a legitimate part of their life and instead want it to be written off as being, "Theirs",..you know, the Republicans and other conservative haters.
Think I'm kidding? Take a look at the Salt Lake Tribune political cartoon the Standard Times used last week.
The newspaper would obviously like the reader to consider that Christianity has been hijacked by the Right wing and that the Republicans say "God hates gays". There are two inherently erroneous things here but in fairness, there are some on the right at fault for this. One is that, as far as I know my Roman Catholic church and the Holy Bible both teach that God hates the actions of homosexuality but loves the sinner. The liberals are more off than on here. Several scattered far right wing preachers and pastors do in fact preach hatred toward the homosexual but most teach what is found in the Holy Bible and that is:
Old Testament
And they called Lot, and said to him: Where are the men that came in to thee at night? bring them out hither that we may know them:
11 And them that were without, they struck with blindness from the least to the greatest, so that they could not find the door. 12 And they said to Lot: Hast thou here any of thine? son in law, or sons, or daughters, all that are thine bring them out of this city: 13 For we will destroy this place, because their cry is grown loud before the Lord, who hath sent us to destroy them. - Genesis 19:6-13
*Know: The Hebrew word here is yada (yod daleth ayin). The Greek
word gino:sko: is used similarly in the New Testament. Sexual Intercourse.
22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind, because it is an abomination. Leviticus 18:22
13 If any one lie with a man as with a woman, both have committed an abomination, let them be put to death: their blood be upon them. Leviticus 20:13
23 And the old man went out to them, and said: Do not so, my brethren, do not so wickedly: because this man is come into my lodging, and cease I pray you from this folly. 24 I have a maiden daughter, and this man hath a concubine, I will bring them out to you, and you may humble them, and satisfy your lust: only, I beseech you, commit not this crime against nature on the man. 25 They would not be satisfied with his words; which the man seeing, brought out his concubine to them, and abandoned her to their wickedness: and when they had abused her all the night, they let her go in the morning. Judges 19: 23-25
New Testament
26 For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. 27 And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. Romans 1: 26, 27
9 Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, 10 Nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God. 1 Corinthians 6:9
9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for the just man, but for the unjust and disobedient, for the ungodly, and for sinners, for the wicked and defiled, for murderers of fathers, and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 For fornicators, for them who defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and whatever other thing is contrary to sound doctrine, 1 Timothy 1:9, 10
Of course the point to c/p the scripture is to validate the fact that it is indeed the Holy Bible and not "Rightwing hatemongers" that states the above warnings to those who would listen. As for the rest of us, we should also note that there are many more sins in the book condemned by God which each and every one of us is guilty of somewhere along the way. The profound difference is this; Conservative theologians concur that all sins are wrong and atonement must be made. Liberal theologians teach that God loves all and nothing is going to make him mad enough to banish his children from eternal bliss. For Christians the religion brings the greatest of news but warns of the failure to meet the criteria. For Humanists and even liberal Christians, nothing bad will happen despite what one does with ones life. As it happens, this debate has been going on since men began to ponder these things and will continue long after my life has ended.
I think it is both sad and disastrous that liberal powers like that found in the gay lobby, pressure its members to pick and choose which religon they would belong to; Christianity or Humanism. The fascist peer pressure is open proof that liberalism is not liberating and that the left are the ones doing the hijacking. They have hijacked the word liberal which should mean being open to changes for the better or progressive. Instead the left has become repressive and tyrannical in its positions of social, political and scientific direction.
Democrats are not allowed to speak in any venue of importance on pro-life and other pro-traditional family values issues. It is both political and social suicide should one wish to remain in the blessings of the ranks to the left of center. On matters of politics or science we see the victims in Joe Lieberman for his position on the war and any scientist/ climatologist that questions Global Warming. The message is clear; Be quiet, remain in complete agreement or be gone.
Increased intolerance towards Christianity and its members is easily followed and the absense of any criticism by those charged with pointing it out, aka the mainstream media, local or otherwise is tragic and the zenith of hypocrisy for those espousing universal tolerance and acceptance.